.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Ask the Pastor

† Theological musings and answers to selected questions by a confessional Lutheran pastor.






27 July 2005

More on the Temptation of Christ


Q: I’m extremely confused; Jesus couldn’t sin, yet what he was tempted to do was sin. How can you be tempted to do something you’re incapable of doing? I mean, I’m not tempted, say, to turn my jug of water into wine even though it would save me a few dollars. Because I can’t do it. [Question comes as a comment to the previous post.]

Temptation of Christ
A: Part of our problem is that we understand temptation only as people who have succumbed to it. We view it as sinful humans, not as our Father or as the sinless Son of God. Note that Hebrews 4:15 confesses, “For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but one who in every respect has been tempted as we are, yet without sin.”

We also must fully understand the Greek word πειράζω (peirazo) translated as as “tempt” in most English Bibles’ accounts of Jesus in the Wilderness. However, peirazo has a fuller definition including “to make proof of, to attempt, test, tempt.” The English Standard Version I normally quote in the column renders it “examine” in 2 Corinthians 13:5, “test” (with the intent of entrapment) in Matthew 16:1 and John 8:6, “tempt” in the Wilderness accounts and elsewhere, and “attempt” in Acts 9:26. If you compare these to other versions, you might see different renderings chosen by different translators.

In looking at the full meaning of the original text, we see that what Jesus experienced was a true testing, an attempt by Satan to trap Him. The possibility of failure doesn’t need to be factored in, however, to our understanding. By means of a (feeble) earthly comparison, imagine a sadistic yet talented high school math teacher testing his class by composing the most difficult examination he can. By sheer intellectual ability, he could cause all his class to fail the test. However, if the principal wants the class to pass, suppose that he says one person can take the test on behalf of all the students. He then goes so far as to choose the substitute, a brilliant mathematician who sits on the faculty of a world-class university. The substitute not only answers all the questions perfectly, he also corrects errors made by the tester. In a way, this is what we see in Scripture, especially in the Matthean and Lukan accounts of Christ’s temptation.

Of course our analogy breaks down in several areas. For instance, we’ve already failed many tests. We’re undisciplined, unruly, and unworthy of any mercy. We deserve failure and the accompanying consequences. Also, the difference between the Devil and our Lord Jesus is vastly greater than that between the tester and the test-taker mentioned above.

To sum things up, whether by Satanic means or Fatherly abandonment, Christ was fully (if not, by our standards, “fairly”) tested, tempted, and tried throughout His earthly life. Whether through early peer pressure during the years not recorded, by the misunderstanding and desertion of His followers, with betrayal and denial, or by any other means, Jesus faced every possible hurdle to perfectly fulfilling the Law and doing His Father’s bidding. He withstood temptation; He passed all the tests; He was proven to be the genuine and perfect Substitute. Truly, He was “tempted as we are, yet without sin.”

Scripture quoted from The Holy Bible, English Standard Version™, © 2001 by Crossway Bibles.

Send email to Ask the Pastor.

Walter Snyder is the pastor of Holy Cross Lutheran Church, Emma, Missouri and coauthor of the book What Do Lutherans Believe.

1 Comments:

Blogger Paul said...

Pastor Snyder, I see what you're trying to say, but doesn't the test analogy break down fundamentally because for the brilliant mathematician, it wasn't a test at all?

Tested, entrapped... I don't see those words as being far from what a "temptation" is...

Basically, it sounds like you might be saying that the word "temptation" as applied to Jesus Christ has nothing to do with temptation as we experience it.

And it that's the case, it's hard for me to understand what the meaning of the passage could be?

29 July, 2005 19:41  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home